“The government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem.” – Milton Friedman.
Back in 2019, the Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA) was drowning in its IT mess. Picture this: over 200 different software applications, some so old they could qualify for social security benefits themselves, all running on completely separate systems scattered across data centers nationwide.
When a simple server update required calling three different departments just to figure out what might break, you know there’s a serious problem. The VA’s story isn’t unique among federal agencies, but its approach to fixing it offers valuable insights for government IT leaders struggling with similar chaos.
When legacy systems become digital quicksand
Government organizations inherit decades of technology decisions that made sense at the time but create nightmares today. The VA’s infrastructure looked like a technology museum where nothing talked to anything else.
Its first CMDB software deployment tried to catalog every single piece of equipment, every application, every cable connection. Six months later, the VA had beautiful spreadsheets and absolutely no improvement in service delivery.
The real breakthrough came when the VA stopped thinking about hardware and started thinking about veterans. Instead of asking “what servers do we have,” it began asking “what technology supports disability claims processing?” This shift changed everything.
ITIL 4 meets bureaucracy
Government agencies love frameworks, and ITIL 4 provided exactly the structure the VA needed without adding more red tape. The service value stream concept resonated with federal managers who understood mission-critical processes but struggled with technical complexity.
Take the disability claims example. Veterans file claims online, which triggers database queries, document retrieval from medical systems, decision support tools, and notification processes. When any piece fails, veterans wait longer for benefits they’ve earned. The CMDB became their roadmap for understanding these connections.
ITIL 4’s emphasis on collaboration also helped bridge the gap between IT staff and program managers. Both groups finally spoke the same language about service delivery rather than arguing about technical specifications versus business requirements.
Security headaches and compliance nightmares
Federal IT teams face security requirements that would make private sector CIOs weep. Everything needs approval, certification, continuous monitoring, and audit trails. The VA’s CMDB software selection process took 18 months because vendors had to prove their solutions met Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program standards.
But here’s the interesting part: once implemented, the CMDB made compliance easier. Security teams could quickly identify which systems handled sensitive data, track configuration changes that might create vulnerabilities, and generate reports for auditors without manually hunting through dozens of different systems.
Real results, not just better documentation
The VA measured success differently from most organizations. It cared less about technical metrics and more about veteran outcomes. Disability claim processing times dropped by 23%. Online service availability improved significantly. Most importantly, IT staff could focus on improving services instead of constantly firefighting mysterious system problems.
The VA’s CMDB investment paid off because the agency treated it as a service enablement tool rather than just an inventory system. Other government agencies can learn from the VA’s experience by focusing on mission outcomes from day one.
Be First to Comment